De novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis and acute tubulointerstitial nephritis after COVID-19 vaccination: A report of six cases from a single center.

Billions of COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered to combat the ongoing global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. While these vaccines are considered safe, with most adverse events being mild to moderate and transient, uncommon systemic side effects of the vaccines, including de novo or re-activation of various glomerular diseases have recently been observed. We report 6 patients who developed glomerular or acute tubulointerstitial disease shortly after receiving COVID-19 vaccinations. Five of these patients received mRNA vaccines (3 Moderna, 2 Pfizer-BioNTech) and 1 received adenovirus-26 vector vaccine (Johnson and Johnson/Janssen). Four of our patients developed de novo glomerulonephritis or acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN), while the other 2 had re-activation of prior glomerulonephritis. Two patients presented with acute kidney injury (AKI) characterized by severe ATIN. While both of them also had evidence of immune complex glomerular disease, ATIN was the dominant feature on the biopsies. Two other patients presented with high-grade proteinuria and AKI. Like the aforementioned patients, these patients had evidence of immune complex glomerular disease, but acute onset nephrotic syndrome was the leading clinical feature. Another patient presented with de novo myeloperoxidase-anti-neutrophil-cytoplasmic-antibody-associated pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis. Yet another patient had re-activation of immunoglobulin-A glomerulonephritis that had been quiescent for several years prior to the vaccination. It is difficult to ascertain any causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and onset/recurrence of kidney diseases. However, vigilance about occurrence of such complications is imperative. Importantly, all our cases responded well to the immunosuppressive treatment.

Identification of potential antiviral compounds against SARS-CoV-2 structural and non structural protein targets: A pharmacoinformatics study of the CAS COVID-19 dataset.

SARS-CoV-2 is a newly discovered virus which causes COVID-19 (coronavirus disease of 2019), initially documented as a human pathogen in 2019 in the city of Wuhan China, has now quickly spread across the globe with an urgency to develop effective treatments for the virus and emerging variants. Therefore, to identify potential therapeutics, an antiviral catalogue of compounds from the CAS registry, a division of the American Chemical Society was evaluated using a pharmacoinformatics approach. A total of 49,431 compounds were initially recovered. After a biological and chemical curation, only 23,575 remained. A machine learning approach was then used to identify potential compounds as inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 based on a training dataset of molecular descriptors and fingerprints of known reported compounds to have favorable interactions with SARS-CoV-2. This approach identified 178 compounds, however, a molecular docking analysis revealed only 39 compounds with strong binding to active sites. Downstream molecular analysis of four of these compounds revealed various non-covalent interactions along with simultaneous modulation between ligand and protein active site pockets. The pharmacological profiles of these compounds showed potential drug-likeness properties. Our work provides a list of candidate anti-viral compounds that may be used as a guide for further investigation and therapeutic development against SARS-CoV-2.

Digital Droplet PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Resolves Borderline Cases.

OBJECTIVES: The Bio-Rad SARS-CoV-2 ddPCR Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was the first droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay to receive Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization approval, but it has not been evaluated clinically. We describe the performance of ddPCR-in particular, its ability to confirm weak-positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) results. METHODS: We clinically validated the Bio-Rad Triplex Probe ddPCR Assay. The limit of detection was determined by using serial dilutions of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in an artificial viral envelope. The ddPCR assay was performed according to the manufacturer's specifications on specimens confirmed to be positive (n = 48) or negative (n = 30) by an FDA-validated reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay on the m2000 RealTime system (Abbott). Ten borderline positive cases were also evaluated. RESULTS: The limit of detection was 50 copies/mL (19 of 20 positive). Forty-seven specimens spanning a range of quantification cycles (2.9-25.9 cycle numbers) were positive by this assay (47 of 48; 97.9% positive precent agreement), and 30 negative samples were confirmed as negative (30 of 30; 100% negative percent agreement). Nine of 10 borderline cases were positive when tested in triplicate. CONCLUSIONS: The ddPCR of SARS-CoV-2 is an accurate method, with superior sensitivity for viral RNA detection. It could provide definitive evaluation of borderline positive cases or suspected false-negative cases.